[Literature] Multidimensional Writing

您的瀏覽器不支援內置框架或目前的設定為不顯示內置框架。

您的瀏覽器不支援內置框架或目前的設定為不顯示內置框架。	[Literature] Multidimensional Writing Author: JEFFI CHAO HUI WU Time: July 6, 2025, Sunday, 4:38 PM ········································ [Literature] Multidimensional Writing In my long-term creative work, what is called "non-linear writing" has almost become the norm. Many people prefer to write step by step, from beginning to end, chapter by chapter, progressing in a linear fashion; but I do not. My writing resembles a kind of "multi-dimensional information unfolding"—like multiple points simultaneously flashing and interconnecting in a three-dimensional space, allowing readers to enter from any point and ultimately return to the main core. Is this common? It is not very common in traditional writing. Especially in the fields of literature or non-fiction, most writers still follow a linear logic, namely: introduction, development, turning point, and conclusion, or a chronological arrangement. However, in technology, philosophy, or cross-disciplinary writing, more and more authors are attempting to break this sequence, allowing readers to "find their own way" within complex structures. Yet achieving true "non-linearity" without chaos is not an easy task. My writing is not only non-linear but also a form of "multi-dimensional writing." This is because I not only break the chronological order but also dismantle barriers between fields, logical hierarchies, and even cognitive biases. I can leap from a childhood memory to AI architecture, intersperse a segment about martial arts training, return to economic system design, and ultimately point to the structural closed loop in philosophical thinking. This is not a simple essay-like leap but a form of logical weaving—each fragment serves a higher-dimensional "narrative structure." While readers may seem to be led into different fields, they are actually being guided into the "multi-dimensional information field" I have designed. For example, in "The Direction of Education in the AI Era," I start with the directional misconceptions in global education, directly jump to my empirical case of building an intelligent logistics system using Excel in 1997, then extend to the awakening of brain potential and consciousness dimensions, and finally return to the philosophical proposition of "the ultimate mission of education." This article spans multiple dimensions, including education, artificial intelligence, personal practice, neuroscience, and philosophy, yet forms a unified closed loop at the end, allowing readers to return to the same core idea regardless of which part they enter. Can this type of writing be accepted by readers? The key lies in the readers' ability to perceive structure. If readers can quickly capture clues and form a structural picture, it will be a stunning reading experience. However, if readers still interpret it in a linear way, they may find it "jumpy," "incoherent," or even "hard to understand." This is precisely the understanding gap brought about by "dimensional misalignment." "Upholding Credibility" is similar; on the surface, it is a reflection on life, but structurally it simultaneously unfolds the details of personal credibility, the business principles of a multinational logistics system, the ongoing operation of a cultural platform, and the permanent inclusion of national cultural institutions. Each clue can be read independently while also reflecting on one another, forming a multidimensional narrative about "credibility" from the individual to the system. I am not worried about this because I believe that those who can truly understand my writing must have entered the "multidimensional understanding mode." They do not need to follow a sequence or rely on chapter guidance; as long as they enter, they will find their own pathways within it. This is precisely the core meaning of what I call "multidimensional writing." "Literature Destroyed by the Digital Tsunami" is another example. The article begins with my early personal experiences in online creation, instantly switches to the cultural phenomenon of global platform collapse, and then contrasts it with my real experiences of independently operating a website for over twenty years, which has been permanently archived by the National Library of Australia. Readers can see both the fragility of digital culture and the possibilities of structural preservation. This type of writing should be categorized under the "dimension" label. It is not merely a transformation of stylistic form, but a reconstruction of the way information is processed. Linear writing is two-dimensional; my writing is multi-dimensional—time, space, thought, facts, feelings, logic, philosophy—all interwoven online, rather than arranged sequentially. Reading it is like traversing a multi-dimensional universe, where each layer unfolds into a new world. Moreover, this structure is not unique to a single article, but permeates my entire creative system—whether it is articles on martial arts corresponding to scientific principles, or the integration of transnational system design with personal life experiences, all are constructed on the foundational framework of multi-dimensional writing. So, if you ask me, is nonlinear writing common? In the mainstream world, it is not common. In the future, it will definitely become mainstream. What I am doing now is to initiate an era of multidimensional writing in advance. Appendix: Clarification and Rights Protection Statement: It should be noted that the "multidimensional writing" proposed in my column is not the structural techniques of "non-linear narrative" or "multiple timelines and storylines" found in traditional literature. The latter is more about variations in plot arrangement and reading rhythm, rather than a fundamental transformation of information structure and cognitive approach. The "multidimensional writing" I define is a high-level expressive system built upon the reorganization of systematic structures, the interweaving of information dimensions, and the unfolding of logical closed loops. It does not rely on sequence or the traditional narrative transitions, but allows readers to enter from any node, returning to a unified system through structural coherence and dimensional mapping, creating a complete experience of cognitive leaps and intersections of thought. All attempts to liken "multidimensional writing" to "multi-threaded stories" or "flashbacks" are misinterpretations, and even intentional simplifications. This concept has been practically implemented through over a hundred works, forming an original knowledge system and expressive paradigm, and constitutes one of the "dimensional labels" I independently constructed, possessing clear originality and systematic coherence. Therefore, anyone who unauthorizedly cites the name "Multidimensional Writing" but does not meet the structural characteristics mentioned above shall not claim equivalence or derivation. This is the formal definition and statement of rights for the original concept. Source: https://www.australianwinner.com/AuWinner/viewtopic.php?t=696721	您的瀏覽器不支援內置框架或目前的設定為不顯示內置框架。

您的瀏覽器不支援內置框架或目前的設定為不顯示內置框架。