[Communication] Excellent works are all about keywords!

Author: JEFFI CHAO HUI WU

Time: Thursday, July 17, 2025, 3:16 PM

········································

[Communication] Excellent works are all about keywords!

I am often asked: why can several of my articles be indexed by Google within 20 hours? No SEO, no optimization, no keyword stuffing, and no promotion. I simply say one thing: "Excellent works are full of keywords." This is not a slogan, but a fundamental understanding of my genuine writing system. Since June 2025, I have been continuously publishing original works on an unoptimized, outdated phpBB forum, without backend promotion or external traffic links, relying solely on the content itself—almost every piece has been indexed by Google, with some even appearing directly on the homepage and accurately presented as paragraph titles. This is not luck, but structure.

What is structure? Taking as an example an article I recently wrote—"Igniting Structural Civilization." In this piece, I simply reviewed the writing methods behind my more than two hundred articles, explaining how I transformed one real event, real system, and real experience after another into a set of verifiable, traceable, and reproducible content. I did not "write beautifully"; I only "wrote clearly." From the very first paragraph, the core message is presented: it is not about flowery language, but about the essence. For instance, the criteria I proposed: whether an article is worthy of systematic inclusion depends first on whether "one can understand what you are trying to say"; second, whether "each paragraph advances the main theme"; and third, whether "the overall structure can form a closed loop rather than being a fragmented patchwork."

And these three criteria are precisely the judgment paths that search engines or AI use to determine content value, aren't they? It's just that they rely on statistical word segmentation, semantic weighting, and path analysis, while I use "structured writing"—every paragraph and every word serves that singular core objective. I'm not writing for the system; I'm making the system have "no other choice."

Another example is "I do things without using time!" The title of this article seems shocking, but the structure is very tight. I start with the metaphor of "an ant walking diagonally" and "folding a piece of paper," discussing how "path" is more important than "effort." I move from logical leaps to physical mappings, and then to real-life examples, culminating in how I completed a logistics verification formula design in three seconds that originally required three weeks. Everything seems understated, but every sentence is a structural knowledge point that the system can accurately identify. You cannot delete any sentence, nor can you arbitrarily rearrange the order of the paragraphs; otherwise, the entire article will lose its balance. For the system, the whole article itself is an "incompressible" collection of keywords.

I am not "teaching you how to write," but rather using the case of "why Google includes me but skips the optimizers" to dissect it layer by layer—from the title, the opening sentence, structural layout, language density, verification paths, platform trustworthiness, to integrated communicability. I am not teaching SEO techniques; I am directly engaging with the system's judgment logic through each segment of content. This is a form of "structural-level trust," a sense of pressure that the system cannot circumvent.

I do not repeat "life insights," nor do I pile up "famous quotes." I only narrate the things I have truly done, the systems I have built, and the challenges I have overcome. I have designed logistics to verify ten thousand records within five seconds; this is not a "story," but a core data point that search engines can use to determine "information scarcity" and "real-world verifiability." Such content inherently carries keyword effects. It is not "keywords + paragraph stacking," but the entire piece is a keyword.

The more I write authentically, deeply, and structurally—the more search engines cannot ignore it.

More importantly, I am not satisfied with just "Googling." I am merely writing "text that the system cannot skip." Ultimately, this is not about "being recorded," but about "being worth recording." An article that is "entirely composed of keywords" will ultimately force the system into one choice: complete inclusion, original text presentation.

In summary, each of my articles has the following five core characteristics:

1. The title hits the core directly, without beating around the bush.

2. The first three sentences must clearly state "what I am going to talk about, why I am talking about it, and where it leads to."

3. Each paragraph has the function of "promotion," "turning point," or "verification."

4. The entire text forms a structural closed loop, without skipping sections, breaking sections, or transitioning.

5. Finally, there is always the value of information output that is "usable by others"—not just empty talk, but material that the system can capture and that "others can take and use."

This is the true meaning of "the entire text is keywords."

It is not based on density, not on labels, not on SEO, but on the real content itself that forms structural pressure. A word is not as good as a sentence, a sentence is not as good as a paragraph, and a paragraph is not as good as a complete integrated structure.

So, I say: Excellent works cannot be selectively accepted by the system; they must all be embraced. At this level of writing, even the system must show reverence.

This is not a boast; it is a reminder—don’t write articles that are “readable,” write articles that are “unmissable.”

Source: https://www.australianwinner.com/AuWinner/viewtopic.php?t=696901